You might also check out some jlinx posts from the last election year. Search terms: speechification and fact-checking
For anyone who missed it (or the ensuing analysis, rounded up here) the exchange can be summed up in two lines of dialogue:
Times to Internet: Should we fact-check the things politicians say?
Internet to Times: Are you freakin’ kidding?
That was an actual response, and a popular refrain: More than a dozen comments included some variant of, “This is a joke, right?” Several readers compared the column to an Onion piece. By far the most common reaction, which shows up in scores of comments, was to express dismay at the question or to say it captures the abysmal state of journalism today. A typical example, from “Fed Up” in Brooklyn: “The fact that this is even a question shows us how far mainstream journalism has fallen.”
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
on objectivity, blanace and fact-checking
Whose job is it to fact-check, especially in an election year? Go here for a nuanced look by Neiman Journalism Lab writer Lucas Graves that goes deep into the murky definition of "journalistic objectivity." It all stemmed from a query by the New York Times public editor Arthur Brisbane. Here's a taste: